About the author:
Stephen Humphrey is a freelance writer and journalist who has lived in Toronto since 1994...
Follow Stephen on Twitter
Tags:
2010 municipal election (2), Adam Giambrone (5), Toronto Transit Commision, TTC (20)OMG! Did you hear? Adam Giambrone cheated on his girlfriend and the other woman called the press because she totally thought he was married, which he wasn’t but then she read it in the paper and, like, totally went public.
OMG! That’s, like, so Tiger Woods!
You bet. Toronto city councillors are finally giving the city a show. I mean, the garbage strike was all kinds of thrills and spills, but it was messy and called for audience participation.
Now the city has a straightforward sex scandal. Despite the inherent initial shocker that there is, in fact, one municipal councillor who doesn’t need Viagra, the whole thing has unfolded with maudlin predictability.
Giambrone, who generally looks younger than his 32 years, faces the press looking like a bashful 12-year-old as he informs Torontonians he’s let down his girlfriend, fellow councillors, human civilization, god and Buddha by sleeping with multiple women. He tearfully withdraws from the mayoral race.
Councillor Denzel Minnan-Wong, always up for grabbing a little face-time, demands Giambrone’s resignation as Toronto Transit Commission chair. On camera he looks like a sullen 10-year-old.
Businesses and residents between Dovercourt and Lansdowne, outraged about the loss of parking spots to streetcar routes, say they always knew he couldn’t be trusted.
Journalists, sensing greatness around the corner through their exposure of civic peccadilloes, pull out their Bartlett’s Quotations and wax literary.
For example, Toronto Star reporter Linda Diebel writes:
“In making the decision of a lifetime, Adam Giambrone lived through a long, dark night of the soul.”
Nice. Here, let me try one:
“Yesterday the Toronto Transit Commissioner took an emergency short-turn on the Streetcar Named Desire.”
Too Blanche Dubois?
Okay, how about:
“Would you could you on a train? Would you could you in an elected public official’s office?”
Meanwhile, commentators in various media blabber on about “Blah-blah-blah role model… Blah-blah-blah Tiger Woods…”
At least we can be thankful that Canadians still don’t have the gumption to construct some monstrosity like Fox News. Otherwise we’d have a six-pack of commentators with bared fangs and retro hairstyles, frothing with indignation in some tic-tac-toe split-screen thing.
Nonetheless, like all reality television, the matter seems more scripted than fiction.
And I may be a bad citizen for saying so, but am I supposed to care about all this? It’s gaudy, there’s sex, but what is it besides someone’s private life?
It’s the 21st century. Should I have to revert to a turn-of-the-century Baptist every time a politician gets down?
Or why should anyone maintain the 18th-century fiction that politicians – especially city politicians – are these Napoleonic figures who stride through halls of power clothed in some patina of virtue?
And we wonder why politicians lie. They say things they don’t mean that we don’t believe, but we’re more comfortable with the denial. Sounds like a cheating relationship, doesn’t it? We’re such enablers.
Anyway, it’s our role as voters is to elect people, not canonize them, right?
And sure, it’s true that infidelity hurts people, and for certain Giambrone is accountable to certain individuals in his life. But did he harm his constituents? And please don’t bring up the parking spots. There’s more to life than parking.
Can Giambrone handle transportation issues or not should be the question. Instead, the question is becoming whether transit’s future will slide with the personality so closely tied to it.
This is a crucial time for transit projects in Toronto. Ten-year projects such as a city-wide LRT are in early stages, subject to fickle winds of funding. The city just wrote a big cheque to Bombardier to build new streetcars. There’s adjustment to Metrolinx, the TTC’s adopted big brother.
Then there are fare hikes, labour issues, customer revolts, plus councillors and mayoral candidates – many now on the warpath against Giambrone’s virility – using the phrase “war on cars.”
Finally there’s an election in the works that could shake up all of the above like a tumbler full of bingo balls.
I, for one, hope we can get all the innuendo and outrage out of our system and get back to, you know, issues.
What’s more crucial for this city - an actionable vision for public transit or what’s behind some councillor’s pants?
Meri Perra 7:18 pm on February 13, 2010 Permalink |
Thank you! Very refreshing take on the issue!
Mark 8:02 pm on February 13, 2010 Permalink |
I’ll take FOX news over any US or Canadian news channel. Any day. The leftist garbage is nauseating.
J. Younger 8:12 pm on February 13, 2010 Permalink |
Yeah! Like who really gives a hoot? The p’d off girl friend and who else?
There should be a law that says everyone accusing and pointing fingers should have their sex life made public as well, especially all editors and newspaper CEO’s.
thenonconformer 8:46 pm on February 13, 2010 Permalink |
Giambrone, who generally looks younger than his 32 years, he proably lies abiout his age like he lied about everthing else
http://thenonconformer.wordpress.com/2010/02/11/toronto-councillor-adam-giambrone-lies/
Allen Fields 8:56 pm on February 13, 2010 Permalink |
You try having sex on your employers’ office coach during working hours and revealing information that could give someone an advantage over everyone else. You might not make the news but, you sure will make the unemployment line.
PreachJohn 9:11 pm on February 13, 2010 Permalink |
‘…god and Buddha…’
Typo or deliberate slight?
PreachJohn 9:15 pm on February 13, 2010 Permalink |
And if it’s a deliberate slight, gg’s post has my vote!
Chris Greaves 9:19 pm on February 13, 2010 Permalink |
Elected officials are elected and paid as good decision-makers.
If I make a bad decision, or tell a lie, it is no big deal, but a public official demonstrating poor decision-making should not be left in a position where their decisions (in this case on public transit) affect us all.
Kim Champion 9:28 pm on February 13, 2010 Permalink |
Grreat blog! I don’t think Giambrone should have resigned. He should’ve stuck it out and let the people decide on Oct. 25, 2010 whether or not they think he’s fit to be mayor of Toronto. Granted, he’d likely not get the female vote, but who knows? He’s slinking away makes me question how much of a contender he was in the first place.
Stephen Humphrey 9:46 pm on February 13, 2010 Permalink |
The NOW editorial said similar things, that private life is his business, but his damage-control skills were questionable.
http://tinyurl.com/ya6hto2
realitycheck 4:23 am on February 14, 2010 Permalink |
His damage-control skills were not questionable… they were non-existant. To me this issue isn’t who he slept with. It’s that he was such a moron leaving a text trail showing what contempt he had for both his mistress and his supposed long term partner.
Stephen Humphrey 4:30 am on February 14, 2010 Permalink |
So it’s not the indiscretion, it’s the getting caught that bothers you?
realitycheck 12:06 pm on February 14, 2010 Permalink |
It’s not the indiscretion… it’s not the getting caught… it’s that someone is so bloody STUPID that they’d leave a trail of text messages about it … that demonstrates extremely poor judgment … and also a certain belief that one is invulnerable (this is the same guy who roundly criticized for sending a vaguely threatening email to a fellow councillor a while back, an episode from which he’s seemed to have learned nothing… and also let’s be clear… what bothered me about the text messages themselves was not so much that they pointed to an indiscretion but that they pointed to someone who treated the women in his life with such contempt. Clinton’s was an indiscretion… as for AG’s situation, the text messages highlight an issue WAYYY beyond indiscretion. Bottom line is why should someone who has proved themselves so manipulative, deceitful and STOOOOPID be entrusted with the Mayor’s Chair…or any public office of consequence.
alp 4:45 pm on February 14, 2010 Permalink |
Let’s get a real handle on this and put it in perspective.
1. He is immature and has told innumerable lies in the week
2. He deliberately misled the public
3. His judgement is out to lunch
4. He has screwed up every job he has touched so far including his own constituency and the TTC, St Clair ROW etc. and has no feeling for fiscal responsibility
5. He is an NDP and union associate
In conclusion ask yourself if this is the kind of guy we need for mayor to run a city with a budget (over $8 billion annually) larger than some of the provinces.
In reviewing the above one could come to the conclusion that he has all the qualifications of a great politician, but we need to run this city like a business not a playground for another ‘pothole’ filler.
5.